Prices are divided into three parts, wages, profits, and rent,
and the whole annual produce is divided into the same three parts;
but we may distinguish between gross and net revenue.
Gross rent is the whole sum paid by the farmer; net rent what is left free to the landlord.
Gross revenue is the whole annual produce: net revenue what is left free after deducting the maintenance of fixed and circulating capital.
The whole expence of maintaining the fixed capital must be excluded,
since the only object of the fixed capital is to increase the productive powers of labour, and any cheapening or simplification is regarded as a good.
The cost of maintaining the fixed capital is like the cost of repairs on an estate,
but the expence of maintaining the last three parts of the circulating capital is not to be deducted,
the circulating capital of the society being different in this respect from that of an individual
The maintenance of the money alone must be deducted.
The money resembles the fixed capital, since
(1) the maintenance of the stock of money is part of the gross but not of the net revenue,
and (2) the money itself forms no part of the net revenue.
It only appears to do so from the ambiguity of language, sums of money being often used to indicate the goods purchaseable as well as the coins themselves.
We must not add both together.
If a man has a guinea a week he enjoys a guinea’s worth of subsistence, &c.,
and his real revenue is that subsistence, &c.
The same is true of all the inhabitants of a country.
The coins annually paid to an individual often equal his revenue, but the stock of coin in a society is never equal to its whole revenue.
Money is therefore no part of the revenue of the society.
(3) Every saving in the cost of maintaining the stock of money is an improvement.
The substitution of paper for gold money is an improvement.
Bank notes are the best sort of paper money.
When a banker lends out £100,000 in notes and keeps in hand only £20,000 in gold and silver, £80,000 in gold and silver is spared from the circulation:
and if many bankers do the same, four-fifths of the gold and silver previously circulating may be sent abroad,
and exchanged for goods.
either to supply the consumption of another country, in which case the profit will be an addition to the net revenue of the country,
or to supply home consumption (1) of luxuries, (2) of materials, tools and provisions wherewith industrious people are maintained and employed.
If to supply luxuries, prodigality and consumption are increased, if to supply materials, &c., a permanent fund for supporting consumption is provided.
The greater part of the gold and silver sent abroad purchases materials, &c.
The quantity of industry which the circulating capital can employ is determined by the provisions, materials, and finished work, and not at all by the quantity of money.
The substitution of paper for gold and silver increases the materials, tools, and maintenance at the expense of the gold and silver money.
The quantity of money bears a small proportion to the whole produce, but a large one to that part destined to maintain industry.
An operation of this kind has been carried out in Scotland with excellent effects.
There was at the Union at least a million sterling of gold and silver money, and now there is not half a million.
Notes are ordinarily issued by discounting bills,
but the Scotch banks in vented the system of cash accounts,
which enable them to issue notes readily,
and make it possible for every merchant to carry on a greater trade than he otherwise could.
The Scotch banks can of course discount bills when required.
The whole of the paper money can never exceed the gold and silver which would have been required in its absence.
The peculiar expenses of a bank are (1) the keeping and (2) the replenishing of a stock of money with which to repay notes.
A bank which issues too much paper will much increase both the first
and the second expense.
as may be shown by an example.
Banks have sometimes not understood this,
e.g., the Bank of England,
and the Scotch banks.
The excessive circulation was caused by overtrading
A bank ought not to advance more than the amount which merchants would otherwise have to keep by them in cash
This limit is observed when only real bills of exchange are discounted.
Cash accounts should be carefully watched to secure the same end,
as they were for a long time by the Scotch banks, which required frequent and regular operations,
and thus (1) were able to judge of the circumstances of their debtors,
and (2) were secured against issuing too much paper.
Bankers’ loans ought to be only for moderate periods of time.
More than twenty-five years ago the proper amount of paper money had been reached in Scotland, but the traders were not content, and some of them resorted to drawing and redrawing,
which shall be explained
Bills of exchange have extraordinary legal privileges.
So two persons, one in London and one in Edinburgh, would draw bills on each other.
Much money was raised in this expensive way.
The bill on London would be discounted in Edinburgh, and the bill on Edinburgh discounted in London, and each was always replaced by another.
The amount thus advanced by the banks was in excess of the limit laid down above, but this was not perceived at first.
When the banks found it out they made difficulties about discounting, which alarmed and enraged the projectors,
then the Ayr bank was established and advanced money very freely, but soon got into difficulties, and was obliged to stop in two years.
Its action and failure increased the distress of projectors and the country generally, but relieved the other Scotch banks.
Another plan would have been to raise money on the securities pledged by borrowers: this would have been a losing business,
and even if profitable would have been hurtful to the country.
Law’s scheme has been sufficiently explained by Du Verney and Du Tot
The bank of England was established in 1694,
enlarged its stock in 1697
in 1708,
in 1709 and 1710,
in 1717, and later.
The rate of interest received by it from the public has been reduced from 8 to 3 per cent. and its dividend has lately been 5½ per cent.
It acts as a great engine of state.
The operations of banking turn dead stock into productive capital, but make its commerce and industry somewhat less secure
Precautions should be taken to prevent the greater part of the circulation being filled with paper.
Circulation may be divided into that between dealers and that between dealers and consumers.
The circulation of paper may be confined to the former by not allowing notes for small sums.
The issue of such notes enables mean people to become bankers.
None for less than £5 should be issued.
This would secure the circulation of plenty of gold and silver,
and would not prevent banks from giving sufficient assistance to traders.
A law against small notes would be a violation of natural liberty necessary for the security of the society.
Paper money payable on demand is equal to gold and silver,
and does not raise prices;
but paper not repayable on demand would fall below gold and silver,
as happened in Scotland during the prevalence of the Optional Clause,
and must have happened in regard to the Yorkshire currencies when small sums were repayable in guineas.
The North American paper currencies consisted of government notes repayable at a distant date, and depreciated the currency to a great degree.
They were therefore justly prohibited.
Pennsylvania was moderate in its issues, and its currency never went below the real par.
The colonial paper was somewhat supported by being received in payment of taxes.
A requirement that certain taxes should be paid in particular paper money might give that paper a certain value even if it was irredeemable.
A paper currency depreciated below the value of the coin does not sink the value of gold and silver.
The only restrictions on banking which are necessary are the prohibition of small bank notes and the requirement that all notes shall be repaid on demand.